A Blog by Jonathan Low

 

Apr 14, 2025

Tariffs Ignore Services - 77% of US GDP and Intangibles 90% of Corporate Value

The Trump administration's tariffs are almost exclusively focused on what can most accurately be described as 'stuff:' tangible goods manufactured in factories. 

The problem is that the US as a whole - and even ostensible manufacturing businesses - now rely on services for much of their profit while intangibles account for much of their market value. These services include software, financing for purchases of expensive items, maintenance contracts and consulting. The emphasis on 19th and early 20th century products rather than services is that it results in a misallocation of resources which could, if left unchecked, cause the US economy and the value of the dollar to suffer because it ignores the actual sources of wealth-generation. JL 

Konrad Putzier and Alana Pipe report in the Wall Street Journal:

While the U.S. buys more goods from abroad than it sells, the opposite is true for services, which include everything from streaming subscriptions to financial advice. Trump left these service exports out of his tariff math, but they are being pulled into his trade warsServices came to dominate the U.S. economy as the country grew wealthier. It was no longer Ford and General Motors that mattered most, but companies such as Microsoft, Alphabet and JPMorgan Chase. Software and financial products became major U.S. exports. The U.S. services trade surplus grew to $295 billion last year, up from $77 billion in 2000. “When you generate bad will, it’s harder to sell stuff.” 

President Trump is wielding tariffs to try to close the massive U.S. trade deficit in goods, which he sees as a sign of economic weakness.

It is only part of the trade story. 

While the U.S. buys more goods from abroad than it sells, the opposite is true for services, which include everything from streaming subscriptions to financial advice. Trump left these service exports out of his tariff math, but they are being pulled into his trade wars

 

On Wednesday, Trump ratcheted up the U.S. trade war with China, but put broader tariffs above 10% on most other countries on ice for 90 days. Sectoral tariffs such as the ones imposed on automobiles weren’t changed.

Still, the shock of Trump’s globe-spanning tariffs has sent countries scrambling and rocked markets as world leaders adapt to a suddenly much more adversarial trade relationship with the world’s biggest economy. 

Countries can’t easily impose tariffs on services, but they can tax, fine or even ban U.S. companies. The European Union has floated going after big U.S. tech companies in response to Trump’s sweeping tariff threats. Trump also put U.S. service exports at risk by irking foreign consumers, many of whom might choose to avoid U.S. banks, asset managers and other firms. An economic slowdown that curbs demand as markets grapple with the president’s extreme trade makeover won’t help either.

U.S. services imports and exports since 2000, by trading partner

Services surplus

EUROPEAN UNION

Services exports

$300 billion

Services imports

200

CANADA

100

$100 billion

0

0

100

100

2000

’05

’10

’15

’20

200

2000

’05

’10

’15

’20

MEXICO

CHINA

$100 billion

$100 billion

0

0

100

100

2000

’05

’10

’15

’20

2000

’05

’10

’15

’20

Source: Commerce Department

For decades, the U.S. and the rest of the world had a deal: Other countries sent cars, phones, clothes and food to the U.S., and in return they got bonds, software and management consultants.

As the U.S. imported more goods from abroad and domestic factories closed, its goods trade deficit swelled to a record $1.21 trillion by 2024. At the same time, the U.S. services trade surplus grew to $295 billion last year, up from $77 billion in 2000. This is a stark reversal from the mid-20th century, when the U.S. was a manufacturing giant and had a goods export surplus, but had a services trade deficit.

Services gradually came to dominate the U.S. economy as the country grew wealthier. It was no longer Ford Motor and General Motors that mattered most, but companies such as MicrosoftAlphabet and JPMorgan Chase. Software and financial products became major U.S. exports. For some of the biggest services firms, foreign markets now matter more than the U.S. 

U.S. services exports, by category

Personal travel

Business

travel

Air

Sea

Computer services

TELECOM,

COMPUTER AND

INFORMATION

7%

TRAVEL

18%

TRANSPORTATION

10%

Information

Telecom

Other

modes

Rein-

surance

Professional

and management

consulting services

Financial-management

services

Securities

lending,

electronic

funds

transfer, etc.

Financial

intermed-

iation

INSUR-

ANCE

2%

FINANCIAL

SERVICES

17%

OTHER

BUSINESS SERVICES

25%

Credit-related

services

Brokerage

and market

making

Audio-

visual

services

Research and

development

licensing

Computer software

Research and development

INTELLECTUAL

PROPERTY

13%

GOVERNMENT

3%

Franchises and

trademarks licensing

MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR

CONSTRUCTION

PERSONAL, CULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL

Note: Figures are for 2023, the latest data available with detailed breakdowns.

Source: Commerce Department

Corporate tax-avoidance strategies also pushed services exports higher, said Brad Setser, an economist at the Council on Foreign Relations. Many U.S. companies register profits in other countries where taxes are lower, and then pay fees to their U.S. parents. Those fees are counted as payments for intellectual property or asset management, which are technically services exports. That is why the U.S. runs massive service-trade surpluses with Ireland, Switzerland and the Cayman Islands.

Revenue exposure, by company

International

Domestic

Mastercard

70.0%

Meta Platforms

63.7

Visa

58.9

Netflix

58.7

Alphabet

51.3

Microsoft

49.1

Oracle

45.1

JPMorgan Chase

21.5

Berkshire Hathaway

18.6

Source: FactSet

In some of these cases, while the U.S. brings in far more goods from these places than it sends out, it sells more services. The U.S. has a large goods deficit with the EU, for example, but that is at least partially balanced by a services surplus. 

And now, EU politicians have hinted that they could target U.S. tech companies in retaliation for U.S. tariffs. “Europe holds a lot of cards, from trade to technology to the size of our market,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a speech before Europe’s Parliament last week. 

Countries and their consumers can lash out against U.S. services in a variety of ways. Foreign tourists booking American hotel rooms and airline tickets count as U.S. exports, but Trump’s actions have stoked rising anti-American sentiment that is turning off would-be travelers. In another blow, China on Wednesday issued a travel warning for the U.S. There is also the risk of foreign customers’ turning against U.S. brands. Trade tensions with China during the first Trump administration ended up hurting U.S. services firms that do business in the country, said David Weinstein, a professor of economics at Columbia University.

“When you generate bad will, it’s harder to sell stuff,” he said.

0 comments:

Post a Comment