A Blog by Jonathan Low

 

Sep 19, 2019

Poll: Two-Thirds of Americans Support Breaking Up Amazon, Google, Facebook

It is worth acknowledging that those polled might change their minds if such break-ups seriously impinged on convenience and pricing.

But assuming people have become more sophisticated about the consequences of tech usage, two-thirds is a very big number, especially across all demographics and ideologies. JL


Emily Stewart reports in Vox:

Americans are on board with breaking up Big Tech, especially if it means companies such as Amazon and Google stop showing them search results they make money off of first. Two-thirds of Americans would support breaking up tech firms by undoing mergers, such as Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram, if it means ensuring more competition in the future. Seven in 10 Americans say it’s a good idea to break up big tech companies when the content they’re showing people is ranked depending on whether the company is making money off of it or not. The results hold across age groups, education levels, demographics, and political ideologies.
Americans are pretty on board with breaking up Big Tech, especially if it means companies such as Amazon and Google stop showing them search results they make money off of first.
Nearly two-thirds of Americans would support breaking up tech firms by undoing recent mergers, such as Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram, if it means ensuring more competition in the future.
Another tech company issue appears to strike a chord with people even more: Almost seven in 10 Americans say it’s a good idea to break up big tech companies when the content they’re showing people is ranked depending on whether the company is making money off of it or not. Basically, when you search for a suitcase to buy on Amazon, it might show you options from its proprietary AmazonBasics line instead of from a company it doesn’t own.
That’s according to polling from progressive think tank Data for Progress in partnership with YouGov Blue shared exclusively with Vox.
And the results hold across most age groups, education levels, demographics, and political ideologies.
A chart showing support by party identification for breaking up big tech.Ryan Mark/Vox
Chart showing support for breaking up big tech because of content prioritization by political party.Ryan Mark/Vox
Across political party identification, Americans are pretty consistent about breaking up Big Tech. The poll shows that on the more extreme ends of both the left and the right, there is more enthusiasm on the matter.
Forty-two percent of Americans who consider themselves very liberal and 40 percent of those who say they’re very conservative strongly support breaking up tech companies to foster competition, while about 30 percent of those who identify as liberal or conservative say the same. (Moderates and people unsure of their political affiliation showed the lowest support). On breaking up for content, 56 percent of people who say they’re very liberal and 47 percent of people who say they’re very conservative back breaking up Big Tech.
Chart showing support for breaking up big tech in order to promote competition by ideology.Ryan Mark/Vox
Chart showing support for breaking up big tech because of content prioritization by ideology.Ryan Mark/Vox
This isn’t particularly surprising — politicians on both sides of the aisle have been ramping up their scrutiny of Big Tech recently. But it’s not entirely clear what we (or many of those lawmakers) really mean when we talk about breaking up tech companies. How to address technology companies — not only in terms of antitrust but also on items such as security and data privacy — is in its policy infancy.
The poll was conducted from September 11 to September 13 and is based on 1,280 interviews conducted by YouGov online of self-identified voters.

Big Tech is a popular target for everybody right now

Tech companies have come under heavy scrutiny, seemingly from every angle, as of late.
In July, the Department of Justice announced a sweeping antitrust review that, while it didn’t name names, made clear that Facebook, Google, and Amazon were on the menu. The department said it would look into “whether and how market-leading online platforms have achieved market power and are engaging in practices that have reduced competition, stifled innovation, or otherwise harmed consumers.”
The FTC is also investigating Facebook over antitrust matters. This summer, it hit Facebook with a $5 billion fine for violating user privacy as part of the Cambridge Analytica scandal. And earlier this month, it fined Google’s YouTube $170 million over violating children’s privacy laws. (To be sure, these fines aren’t particularly effective in the grand scheme of how much money these companies make.)
And it’s not just the federal executive branch. Politicians and government officials from both parties are upping their criticism of tech companies.
On the right, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) has postured himself as an anti-tech crusader. He has proposed multiple pieces of legislation on that front, including one bill that would take away protections for companies regarding the content users post on their platforms and another that would limit time on social media platforms to 30 minutes a day. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and other Republicans continually lambaste Big Tech over alleged bias.
At the state level, attorneys general across the country from both parties have announced investigations into Facebook and Google.
Vox’s Matt Yglesias earlier this year did a deep dive into the wave of calls to break up big tech comanies and why this is happening right now. His findings: Antitrust regulators have been asleep at the wheel and let tech companies “move fast and break things” perhaps too much. That’s let them do harm to suppliers and competitors. Facebook bought Instagram and WhatsApp instead of having to compete with them. Google ranks its restaurant review results over Yelp’s. Per Yglesias:
Beyond the economic and legal details, there’s also a larger struggle over the cultural meaning of Big Tech. After a period in which technology entrepreneurs in particular were often celebrated as “good guys” of the business world — especially in contrast with the bankers of Wall Street — critics are aiming less at a specific legal point and more at a general sense that the richest companies in the world (and the billionaires who own them) are part of the problem. At the same time, antitrust law is a blunt-force weapon, having been developed over the decades to deal with a set of concerns that only partially overlap with the nexus of issues people have about modern technology conglomerates.
It appears as though the backlash against big tech companies isn’t going anywhere — and Americans are getting on board with the idea that something needs to be done.

0 comments:

Post a Comment