This was more of a surprise than perhaps it should have been - and raises further questions about AI's future. After Trump's belligerent Defense Secretary banned Anthropic's AI because the company would not submit to his demands regarding mass surveillance and AI-managed weapons, OpenAI opportunistically leaped in, thinking it had scored a coup, especially given the recent word amongst AI users that Anthropic's AI was clearly superior, especially for professional purposes. But then the backlash hit, with downloads of Anthropic's Claude surpassing OpenAI's ChatGPT and AI prgrammers and engineers across the tech industry brutally criticizing OpenAI's capitulation. OpenAI was forced to rework its Pentagon agreement and its CEO apologized to staff for "subjecting you to this pain."
Over the past year, there has been despair felt by many that Silicon Valley had wholly abandoned its early "don't be evil" mantra and fervently embraced Trump's authoritarianism, with tech leaders competing to see who could debase themselves further - even Apple's CEO showing up at the premier of Amazon's 'Melania' bribe-umentary. And while unapologetic firms like Palantir continue to trumpet their aggressiveness, the OpenAI episode suggests there are far more Silicon Valley workers uncomfortable with the implications of AI development and that they are prepared to speak out about it, which may now result in changed European and, perhaps, US AI policy. JL
Berber Jin and colleagues report in the Wall Street Journal, Jared Perlo and colleagues report in NBC News:
OpenAI announced its Defense Department deal hours after Defense Secretary Hegseth designated Anthropic a supply-chain risk. After backlash against OpenAI’s deal to allow for mass surveillance, Altman unveiled a reworked agreement Monday governing the Defense Department’s use of its AI services which provides stronger guarantees the military won’t use OpenAI’s systems for domestic surveillance. The new agreement states “the AI system shall not be intentionally used for domestic surveillance of U.S. persons and nationals." A groundswell across Silicon Valley criticized Altman and the company for what they saw as capitulation to the Pentagon. Altman (regretted) it looked “opportunistic” and “not united with the field, with extremely difficult brand consequences and very negative PR for us."