A Blog by Jonathan Low

 

May 14, 2026

Standard 10: Each Ukraine Drone Crew Expected To Kill 10 Russians Per Month

The mathematical and managerial precision of this formula is breathtaking. If each Ukrainian drone crew kills 10 Russian soldiers per month (their current average being 3 per month), that will eliminate twice as many soldiers as the Kremlin is able to mobilize. The current record is 30.6 Russians confirmed hit, held by the Madyar's Birds unit of the 414th Brigade

This would require Ukraine's attack drone crews to make one successful strike every two or three days, which is considered realistic. It is, in the bloodless language of business, a target efficiency benchmark. JL

Yevhen Buderatskyi reports in Ukraine Pravda:

Robert "Magyar" Brovdi, Commander of Ukraine's Unmanned Systems Forces, has proposed a formula he calls Standard 10 for UAV crews. The Standard 10 is a target efficiency benchmark under which each attack UAV crew in Ukraine would aim to kill 10 Russian soldiers per month. The current average of a single attack UAV crew is three Russian soldiers killed per month. There is significant room for improvement. 22.3 Russian soldiers have been killed per crew in the Phoenix unit from Ukraine's State Border Guard Service, while the record stands at 30.6 in the Magyar's Birds unit – Ukraine's 414th Brigade. "If most crews reach 10 confirmed hits per month, we will be killing twice as many as Russia is able to mobilise." The formula requires each crew to maintain a pace of one successful strike every two to three days, which he considers realistic.

Ukrainian Ground Drones Assault, Eliminate Russian Kostiantynivka Infiltrators

Ukrainian ground drones, each with a distinctly separate mission, decoyed Russian infiltrators in Kostiantynivka, then sealed the Russians base with an explosion while the third delivered anti-tank mines to Ukrainian infantry who dropped them on the Russians when they refused to surrender and opened fire. JL

Taras Safronov reports in Militarnyi:

Ukrainian ground drones carrying explosives helped eliminate Russian soldiers who infiltrated Kostyantynivka. The group entered an abandoned apartment block (but) their movements were tracked by reconnaissance drones.  Ukrainian forces near the building did not have sufficient manpower to assault it. The command deployed three ground drones, each assigned a separate role. The first was used as a decoy to draw Russian fire. The second, carrying 300 kilograms of explosives, drove directly inside and sealed it with a blast. The third drone delivered anti-tank mines to Ukrainian troops, which were dropped on the Russian position. “They were offered surrender, but they returned fire, so there was no other option but to eliminate them.”

For Russian Troops Inside the Kill Zone, Life Has Gotten Shorter

Russian casualties have risen and many more are being taken prisoner as Ukrainian forces have extended the kill zone along the front. 

The result is that life expectancy for Russian soldiers has dropped. While some Russians reportedly believe this is a deliberate tactic to purge society of its least productive, a more likely - and cynical - explanation may be that the Kremlin wants to keep up the appearance of a war even as any hope of military victory has faltered, by keeping pressure on Ukraine with attacks they know will fail by soldiers whose lives mean nothing to the Russian leadership. JL

Matthew Luxmoore reports in the Wall Street Journal:

An ex-convict missing part of his right arm and two titanium plates in his head was at the tip of Russia’s spear, trying to pierce Ukraine’s defenses in the kind of infantry assault that is yielding meager gains and heavy losses for Russian troops. "Much of the land gained via these tactics becomes a gray zone they do not fully control.” Losses are so heavy that many in the Russian army think the war is a deliberate campaign to purge society of those on its lowest rungs, culling the downtrodden, the homeless, and the prison population. “The approach is yielding diminishing gains." Ukrainian soldiers are baffled by the number of Russians pressing forward under fire as their drones have become more precise and deadly. A year ago they killed an average of 20 Russians a day. Now, that number is 50 to 60.

AI Users Underestimate Cost of Integration Fixes Needed, Now $2.4 Trillion

There is a rich history of Silicon Valley hypesters underestimating the actual costs of implementing new technology and then asserting anyone who raises such apostasy "just doesn't get it," implying that the value of the new tech is so vast and profound that mere interim costs are for the small-minded. In the dotcom era, this referred to returns, which tech's true believers of the day waved off as a non-factor and which now, of course, has become a multi-billion dollar cost crisis. Another ostensible 'non-factor' was the cost of integrating new tech with legacy systems. The assumption was that the then current generation of tech savants would quickly fix those nagging minor inconveniences. Until, that is, Y2K came along and panicked multi-billion dollar solutions needed to be found. 

With AI, history is repeating itself - and legacy systems are again the culprit no one wants to acknowledge. As before, the issue is integration with existing code and systems whose pesky old operating approach can undermine the productivity of AI if not effectively identified and addressed quickly. The term for this overhang of impending technological re-work is 'technical debt.' Current estimates of its potential cost to fix are approximately $2.4 trillion. A sum even some among AI cultists might call real money. JL

Edward Anderson and colleagues report in MIT Sloan Management Review:

When an organization introduces new software into existing systems, it compounds its technical debt - the cost of additional work needed to address shortcuts and quick fixes made during development. Technical debt causes slower development cycles, increased complexity, security vulnerabilities, code duplications, integration problems, dependency conflicts, and other problems that come with AI coding, leading to systems failures. Within brownfield (legacy) systems, AI-generated code must be deployed with extreme care. Southwest Airlines’ 2022 meltdown - which stranded 16,900 flights and cost $750 million - was rooted in technical debt in its crew-scheduling systems. Technical debt also drove the 2024 CrowdStrike outage that led to worldwide failures in health care delivery. Estimates of the cost of technical debt in the U.S. is currently $2.4 trillion. 

May 13, 2026

For Maximum Effect, Ukraine Teams Ground Robots With Aerial Drones

Constant innovation, experimentation and adaptation has given Ukraine a distinct edge in fighting  much larger if bureaucratic Russia.

The latest example is Ukraine's growing ability to combine aerial and ground robot operations to optimize their effectiveness and lethality. JL

Sinead Baker reports in Business Insider:

Ground round robots are very effective on their own, but "when combined, it's more effective than using just an FPV drone or just a ground drone." Uncrewed systems have different strengths and weaknesses in battle. The robots carry heavier weaponry and enter Russian positions, like dugouts, more easily. But aerial drones have the advantage in speed and situational awareness. Flying drones can arrive at target positions first and inform other uncrewed operations, making the operation more effective. "A crucial difference between aerial and ground unmanned systems is the mass that they can carry." A ground robot carrying 66 pounds of explosives into a basement eliminates Russian infantry inside. The biggest aerial drones can carry mines that weigh 22 pounds, while even the smallest ground robots can take 48 pounds. Ground robots armed with machine guns and grenade launchers, are even more powerful when they work alongside its flying drones

Russia's Infantry Are Dying At A Higher Rate And Gaining Less While Doing So

As spring in Ukraine begins to turn to summer, Ukrainian forces are killing more Russians who are making fewer gains even as their casualty rates rise. More effective and efficient drones and drone pilots, more lethal defensive systems, frequently installed or supplanted by technology facing fewer Russian reinforcements have added up to a potentially insurmountable obstacle for the Kremlin's plans. And this appears to be a systemic, not a temporary Ukrainian advantage. JL
 Francis Farrell reports in the Kyiv Independent:

This spring, something strange is in the air. The reality on the battlefield is that instead of picking up over spring as they usually do, Russian territorial gains have flatlined, giving Moscow next to nothing to show for its consistently high losses. A major effort to push northwest of Pokrovsk has bogged down in Hryshyne, advances east of Sloviansk have also ground to a halt, while Kostiantynivka, the southernmost of Ukraine "fortress belt" of cities, is doing its job, making Russia pay a hefty price for each street and house taken. Ukrainian counterattacks upended Russian plans to push west toward Zaporizhzhia.  Venturing into a grey zone that is getting deeper and deadlier every month, Russia's single-use infantrymen continue to die at the same rate, they are just achieving less in the process.

60-70% of Russians Sent Forward Die Before Reaching Ukrainian Lines

Ukraine's kill zone math is becoming inexorable: having squandered their advantage in men and equipment, the Russians no longer have enough troops for assaults. 

And not only are the majority of attacking Russian soldiers or attempted infiltrators killed or severely wounded before they even reach Ukrainian lines, even if they did, the Kremlin forces do not have enough troops to hold anything they take meaning that surviving infiltrators are then mercilessly hunted down and eliminated by Ukrainian drones and hunter-killer infantry teams. JL


Decimus reports in Daily Kos:

Russian frontline assaults rare as 60-70% of infiltrators die before reaching Ukrainian lines. The earlier embarrassment of riches in tracked armor which they threw into every assault now appears to be a faint memory. Ukrainian drones and precision battery put paid to that. (And) the endless pool of mobiki wantonly pressed into “meat assaults” also seem to be drying up. Russia's offensive operations now consist of small-group infiltrations, since the army cannot gather enough men for assaults. (But) infiltration is not always effective because Russia cannot accumulate enough personnel to consolidate any local gains that the surviving fraction of infiltrators might secure. The current Russian tactic is “gradually losing effectiveness,” with advance rates minimal and the manpower deficit growing more visible.