A Blog by Jonathan Low

 

May 21, 2026

"Catastrophic Losses" Mean Russia Doesn't Have Forces To Achieve Goals

The Kremlin continues to spout maximalist goals for its 'conquest' of Ukraine, but the battlefield reality paints an entirely different picture which is that the operational advantage is being seized by the Ukrainians. 

Evidence of Ukraine's strategic managerial superiority comes from their ability to set numerical goals - and then produce results showing how they are advancing towards achieving them. By contrast, the Kremlin's bombast does nothing to affirm their ability to even come close to their own stated outcomes and, in fact, exposes their growing vulnerability. JL

Alex Stezhensky reports in New Voice of Ukraine:

In April, 35,203 Russian troops were killed or seriously wounded. In March, the figure was 35,351; in December, 34,544.” In October, the Russian army lost 67 troops per 1 square kilometer of advance; in January, 165; in February, 244; in March, 254; and in April, 179. The dashboards show a clear pattern: The more Russian forces are hit at operational depth, the fewer assault operations take place at the front. “Our strategic goal is to inflict 200 casualties on the enemy for every square kilometer of advance.” Russian forces' heavy losses means they lack the manpower needed to capture major regional centers such as Sumy or Kharkiv.

"Significant" Russian Donetsk Drone Training, Logistics Center Destroyed, 65 killed

Ukraine's Unmanned Systems Forces in coordination with military intelligence, destroyed Russia's primary drone command center in occupied Donetsk, which included training facilities, ammunition storage, repair shops and sleeping quarters. 65 Russians were killed in addition to the damage done to the facility. JL

The Kyiv Post reports:
Ukraine's Unmanned Systems Forces struck a Russian drone training and production facility used for drone pilot command and accomodation, munitions manufacturing and combat payload assemblage. The coordinated deep strike operation killed Russian personnel while destroying production and repair workshops, along with four Tiger armored vehicles undergoing repairs. Ammunition stocks and drone components were also eliminated. The lieutenant colonel head of the training facility was killed in the attack. Personnel losses were estimated at 65. Underground ammunition storage intensified the destruction.

6 Repeat Russian Assault Attempts Through Sumy Gas Pipeline Annihilated

A little over a year ago, the Russians had a short-lived success infiltrating a unit behind Ukrainian positions through a disused gas pipeline before the infiltrators were discovered and eliminated. 

Despite the fact that Ukrainian forces have been acutely aware of that threat ever since, Russian commanders keep trying it, either believing there is no such thing as the element of surprise or that they just don't have any other options. The latest attempts were again in Sumy oblast where the Russians tried six times within one month to use the same tactic - through the same pipeline. Again (and again and again...) the Russians were spotted and wiped out. And people wonder why Russia isn't winning...JL

RFU News reports:
At Sumy, Russia desperately needed an innovative tactic to break through Ukrainian defenses. Repeated frontal assaults caused severe manpower losses and stalled advances, forcing Russian commanders to search for an infiltration route. They attempted to use the 17 kilometer Urengoy–Pomary–Uzhgorod gas pipeline. As a result of Ukrainian spotting and crossfire with drones, the first Russian forces' attempt was eliminated. The Russians attempted variations of the same pipeline infiltration tactic five times over the course of a single month, with each assault launched less than a week after the previous one. The element of surprise had disappeared as Ukrainians only had to monitor pipeline exits. Despite the losses, the Russians repeatedly sent wave after wave, disregarding the Ukrainians fully adapting to their tactic.

May 20, 2026

Ukraine Is Now Conducting More Offensive Operations Than Russia

Evidence is accumulating that Ukrainian forces have seized the initiative in the war against the Russian invasion. For the first time in three years, the Ukrainians have initiated more offensive operations across the length of the front than have the Russians. 

This suggests both an increase in Ukrainian offensive capabilities and a degradation of Russian resources driven by effective Ukrainian targeting of the Kremlin's military deep inside Russia as well as closer to, but behind, the front as Ukraine's kill zone has expanded, hindering the Russians' ability to launch any operations beyond trying to stay alive. JL

Anzhelika Kalchenko reports in Militarnyi:

The number of offensive operations carried out by Ukrainian Forces currently exceeds that of Russian troops. This is the outcome of systematic efforts to inflict casualties on enemy personnel and reduce their offensive capabilities. Ukrainian units are increasingly imposing their own pace of operations on the enemy. This means that Ukrainian forces are seizing the initiative at the tactical level, forcing Russian troops to react to Ukrainian actions. This shift in the balance of power has been made possible by a combination of precision strikes, the depletion of enemy reserves, and constant pressure on its forward units. This is significant against the backdrop of prolonged Russian offensive operations, where the pace of attacks has been considered one of the enemy’s key advantages.

Wall Street Journal Headline: 'The War In Ukraine Is Going Badly For Russia'

When the dominant, pro-business and pro-Trump newspaper in the US leads with a headline stating that the war is going badly for Russia, it is sending a message. 

That message implies that Russia's invasion cannot achieve its objectives, the war it has ignited is not winnable by Russia and the result is bad for business globally. So the powers that be want Putin to start finding a way to stop it before he causes even more damage to his country's and the global economy, as well as oligarch rule. JL

Marcus Walker and Anastasiia Malenko report in the Wall Street Journal:

Ukraine's military has wrestled Russia’s much-larger army to a halt in recent months, having gained a tactical and technological edge. Ukrainian brigades have learned how to deal better with Russian infiltration tactics, hunting down with drones and cleanup teams enemy soldiers who slip past infantry positions. “We’re seeing diminishing returns for Russia from last year’s adaptations.” Russia’s advances so far this year are the slowest in two years, with little to show for losses that analysts put at up to 35,000 soldiers killed or wounded a month. Parts of the 600-mile front line are now contested in both directions, unlike in 2025. In Russia, the spreading consciousness is that the war is a quagmire

Russian Troops' Fear Grows As Ukraine AI "Slaughterbot" Drones Headhunt Them

A new Ukrainian drone, nicknamed "the Slaughterbot," is AI-driven and features thermal imaging to capture a Russian soldier's heat signature as well as facial recognition to identify individual soldiers, especially officers. Its growing use has led to a sharp increase in drone kill ratios against Russian troops - as well as a concomitant rise in their justifiable fears of death. 

The new drones are small, inexpensive and supremely accurate. Their use is intended to help assure that Ukraine eliminates more Russians per month than the Kremlin is able to recruit. JL

David Hambling reports in Forbes:

A new Ukrainian FPV drone with thermal imaging and AI detects the target’s face and fires a high-velocity projectile at them. A video shows a Russian soldier cut down with a precise head shot from one such drone. A further video confirms the kill. AI-enabled FPVs have an 80% hit rate instead of 40% for manual control. Robert “Magyar” Brovdi, Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Forces commander, has stated a prime goal is taking out Russians faster than they can be recruited, eg, 30,000 a month. Ukrainian drones are now achieving thisDrone kills have increased sharply, driven by deployment of the new anti-personnel drones locked on to a target and which complete the killing process using combat AI, facial targeting and a heat signature.

In OpenAI-Musk Trial, Altman, Musk and AI Were All Tarnished

Legally, OpenAI and Sam Altman won. But in a broader sense, the individuals involved, the tech industry and AI all lost. 

Altman and Musk - as well as a number of their colleagues - came across as untrustworthy, even deceitful, dishonest and selfish. The figurative mud they threw at each other will not go away. Subsequent polls show that when asked who respondents trusted more - Altman, Musk or any AI executive - the overwhelming answer was "none of the above." What this means is not an immediate decline in AI's fortunes, which continues to driven by a combined fear of missing out, irrational exuberance and greater fool theory (the greatest fool being the US government which, under the Trump administration, will be expected to bail out the wealthiest investors should the need arise). But this trial and the arrogant behavior it exposed, further undermines public trust in AI and those who plan to profit from it. And history suggests that can lead to a reckoning. JL

Nick Robins-Early reports in The Guardian:

Over three weeks in an Oakland, California, federal courthouse, the trial pitted the richest person in the world against the biggest names in AI. It provided moments of embarrassment for both tech moguls. Altman and Musk took the stand for hours, facing cross-examinations that accused them each as untrustworthy. The trial repeatedly painted an unflattering portrait of Altman as a deceptive operator. “You told the board that Altman ‘exhibits a consistent pattern of lying, undermining his execs and pitting his execs against one another’." “Yes,” the witness responded. OpenAI cast Musk as a sore loser in the AI race seeking revenge through the suit. OpenAI denied all of Musk’s allegations, arguing that not only was he aware of plans to create a for-profit entity but that he made a failed bid to take control of the company, then departed in a huff in 2018, and founded a competitor