A Blog by Jonathan Low

 

Dec 8, 2023

Greedflation: Research Reveals How Excess Corporate Profits Drove 2022 Inflation

Economic analyses of the causes of 2022's historic inflation increasingly point to price increases driven by corporate profit-taking rather than government policies. 

These assessments reveal excess profit taking, particularly in the energy and food sectors but also tech, telecom and finance boosted inflation and did "significant harm to the economy as a whole" as wages failed to keep pace with rise in prices. The US Federal Reserve and the Bank of England have both begun to document the economic impact of these costs, noting that Global GDP could be 8% higher had prices not become so inflated. JL 

Phillip Inman reports in The Guardian:

Profiteering has played a significant role in boosting inflation during 2022. Analysis of  financial accounts found that profits far outpaced increases in costs, helping to push up inflation last year to levels not seen since the early 1980s. Business profits rose by 30%, driven by just 11% of firms that made super-profits based on their ability to push through stellar price increases, dubbed greedflation. Researchers said ExxonMobil and Shell, mining firms Glencore and Rio Tinto, and commodities businesses Kraft Heinz, Archer-Daniels-Midland and Bunge all saw profits far outpace inflation. “This has caused significant harm to the economy as a whole.”

Profiteering has played a significant role in boosting inflation during 2022, according to a report that calls for a global corporation tax to curb excess profits.

Analysis of the financial accounts of many of the UK’s biggest businesses found that profits far outpaced increases in costs, helping to push up inflation last year to levels not seen since the early 1980s.

The report from the IPPR and Common Wealth thinktanks found that business profits rose by 30% among UK-listed firms, driven by just 11% of firms that made super-profits based on their ability to push through stellar price increases – often dubbed greedflation.

Excessive profits were even larger in the US, where many important sections of the economy are dominated by a few powerful companies.

This surge in profits happened as wage increases largely failed to keep pace with inflation, and workers suffered their largest fall in disposable incomes since the second world war.

Researchers said the energy companies ExxonMobil and Shell, mining firms Glencore and Rio Tinto, and food and commodities businesses Kraft Heinz, Archer-Daniels-Midland and Bunge all saw their profits far outpace inflation in the aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

“Because energy and food prices feed so significantly into costs across all sectors of the wider economy, this exacerbated the initial price shock – contributing to inflation peaking higher and lasting longer than had there been less market power,” the report said.

After the analysis of 1,350 companies listed on the stock markets in the UK, US, Germany, Brazil and South Africa, the report said firms in the technology sector, telecommunications and the banking industry also pushed through significant price increases that raised their profit margins.

“Such companies have been able to protect their profit margins or even increase them, generating excess profits through a combination of high market power and global market dynamics,” the report added.

Carsten Jung, head of economics at the IPPR, said the work of Isabella Weber, an economist at the University of Massachusetts, showed how “systemic sectors” can have an outsized impact on inflation across the wider economy.

The report echoes research by the Unite union, which last year revealed how the biggest price increases affecting the UK consumer prices index (CPI) were driven by firms that either maintained or improved their profit margins.

Among the companies that increased their profits most from the pre-pandemic average were:

  • ExxonMobil: profits of £15bn increased to £53bn

  • Shell: £16bn up to £44bn

  • Glencore: £1.9 bn up to £14.8bn

  • Archer-Daniels-Midland: £1.4bn up to £3.16bn

  • Kraft Heinz: £265m up to £1.8bn

 

  • Four food companies – the listed suppliers Archer-Daniels-Midland and Bunge, plus the privately owned Cargill and Dreyfus – control an estimated 70%–90% of the world grain market.

“This has caused significant harm to the economy as a whole,” the report said. “Global GDP could be 8% higher than it is now had market power not risen. Labour income is likely significantly lower, and economic dynamism is weaker – with poorer choice, worse product quality and fewer economic opportunities – than in a counterfactual world where big corporations were less dominant,” it added.

Some members of the US central bank, the Federal Reserve, have acknowledged that prices rises have risen to boost profits.

Last year, Isabel Schnabel, a member of the executive board of the European Central Bank, said that “on average, profits have recently been a key contributor to total domestic inflation, above their historical contribution”.

Jung and the Common Wealth economist Chris Hayes said a tax on the estimated $4tn of excess global profits was needed alongside moves to break up monopolistic practices that allowed firms to exploit their market power.

Jung said the Bank of England had fallen behind in the debate and needed to “catch up”.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ha! Ha! Ha! This is some of the crappiest economics around! Corporate profits rise in the preliminary phases of an inflationary cycle because they purchased inventory and raw materials at pre-inflation prices, then sell them in an inflationary market. Compare the PPI vs CPI data, and you'll see how much worse it could've been if "greedflation" was a real phenomenon.

Inflation happens thanks to incompetent governments who expand the money supply by bringing future revenue forward via debt issuance (debt is not a zero-sum game, it creates assets that expand the money supply). In so doing, they crush the current working class with Inflation, and doom future generations to a massive tax burden.

Next to political science, macroeconomics has to be one of the biggest academic frauds out there.

Anonymous said...

Simplistic, but you're certainly entitled to your viewpoint.

Post a Comment