John Hudson and Isabelle Khurshudyan report in the Washington Post:
Ukraine has begun firing U.S.-provided cluster munitions against Russian forces in southeastern Ukraine in a push to break up well-fortified Russian positions. In addition to front-line positions in southeast Ukraine, the cluster munitions are also expected to be used near Russian-controlled Bakhmut. The munitions have been fired at Russian positions to break up trenches and to “inflict maximum damage on enemy infantry.” Cluster munitions provide a “bridging capability” to keep pressure on Russian forces until Western arms production picks up and Kyiv will no longer need the hazardous weapon.
The use of the U.S.-made weapons, which has not been previously reported, follows President Biden’s “difficult decision” to order the delivery of the widely banned munitions last week, a move that human rights groups, European allies and some Democrats criticized because of the risk of civilian casualties.
The barrages appeared to be in response to Ukraine’s strike on the bridge connecting Russia to Crimea earlier this week. Shortly after that, Russia withdrew from the U.N.-brokered deal securing the flow of Ukrainian grain exports to the world.
In pulling out of the export deal, Russian President Vladimir Putin accused the West of using the accord as “political blackmail.” Ukrainian officials say the Russian attacks on the ports destroyed 60,000 tons of grain and damaged storage facilities, raising concerns about a global food crisis.
Russia’s Defense Ministry said ships headed to Ukrainian ports on the Black Sea could be considered potential carriers of military cargo to Kyiv and thus “involved in the conflict” — a statement that could reduce the number of vessels willing to transport Ukraine’s grain.
On Sunday, Putin threatened to retaliate against Ukraine’s use of the cluster munitions with the Kremlin’s own supply of the weapons “if they are used against us,” although Russia has already used them in populated areas of Ukraine at least 24 times since the start of Moscow’s invasion on Feb. 24, 2022, according to the United Nations.
Cluster bombs, outlawed in more than 120 countries, explode in the air over a target, releasing dozens to hundreds of smaller bomblets across an area potentially as big as several football fields. Children are particularly vulnerable, as the submunitions can fail to explode until they’re picked up, potentially years after a conflict has ended.
But Ukrainian officials have long requested the munitions, which they say will compensate for their significant disadvantage in artillery, weaponry and troop numbers.
Earlier this week, Col. Oleksandr Bakulin, commander of Ukraine’s 57th Brigade, told BBC News that cluster munitions were needed to “inflict maximum damage on enemy infantry,” although he acknowledged they would not “solve all our problems on the battlefield.”
Others have been more bullish, including Brig. Gen. Oleksandr Tarnavsky, who told CNN last week that the munitions “can radically change” the battlefield, in the first report confirming the delivery of the munitions to the country.
In addition to front-line positions in southeast Ukraine, the cluster munitions are also expected to be used near the Russian-controlled city of Bakhmut, the site of the war’s longest and bloodiest battle.
Russia’s strongholds in the east and south have been densely mined with antitank and antipersonnel mines and trip wires in areas from three to 10 miles deep. The defenses have been successful in stalling Ukraine’s counteroffensive, which began about a month ago.
A Ukrainian official told The Washington Post that the munitions have been fired at Russian positions to break up the trenches. The official, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military operations.
Biden’s move to send the munitions followed months of debate within the administration. The president’s decision bypassed U.S. law prohibiting the production, use or transfer of cluster munitions with a “dud rate” of more than 1 percent. The dud rate refers to the share of munitions that remain unexploded.
Biden circumvented the law under a rarely used provision of the Foreign Assistance Act, which allows the president to provide aid, regardless of arms export restrictions, as long as he determines that doing so is a vital U.S. national security interest.
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin defended the decision last week, saying the cluster munitions provide a “bridging capability” to keep pressure on Russian forces until Western arms production picks up and Kyiv will no longer need the hazardous weapon. Austin said Ukraine committed “in writing” not to use the munitions against population centers and that efforts would be made to try to clean up areas where the weapons are deployed.
“They will record the places that they use them, and they will prioritize demining efforts, and we’ll help them do that in those places where they have used these,” Austin said.
While Russia has used cluster munitions far more extensively, Ukraine has also allegedly deployed these weapons during the war, using Soviet-era stocks or shells obtained from other countries. A Human Rights Watch report released earlier this month said Ukraine’s use of the weapons “caused numerous deaths and serious injuries to civilians” in attacks in the city of Izyum and other locations in 2022. Ukraine has denied using the munitions.
Most of Washington’s NATO allies have signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions, a compact that bans their use and production, but the United States, Russia and Ukraine never signed the treaty.
This week, White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan pushed back on the idea that sending the munitions called U.S. moral authority into question.
“Our moral authority and Ukraine’s moral authority in this conflict comes from the fact that we are supporting a country under a brutal, vicious attack by its neighbor with missiles and bombs raining down in its cities, killing its civilians, destroying its schools, its churches, its hospitals,” Sullivan said. “And the idea that providing Ukraine with a weapon in order for them to be able to defend their homeland, protect their civilians, is somehow a challenge to our moral authority — I find questionable.”
Western officials on Thursday stepped up condemnations of Russia’s decision to pull out of the U.N. grain deal, with the European Union’s top diplomat accusing Moscow of deepening a global food shortage by increasing prices. “This is going to create a big and huge food crisis in the world,” Josep Borrell told reporters.
German officials are trying to prevent Ukrainian grain from rotting in silos, working with allies to get the grain out by rail, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock said Thursday on the sidelines of an E.U. foreign ministers meeting.
The extraordinary levels of violence in the conflict continued to take a toll on civilians and civilian infrastructure.
A Chinese consulate building was damaged during the Russian attack on Odessa, the regional governor said. A Ukrainian drone attack in Crimea, meanwhile, killed a teenage girl, Sergei Aksyonov, the Russian-backed head of occupied Crimea, said on Telegram.
2 comments:
Post a Comment