Google Employees Criticize CEO's "Dumpster Fire" Response To ChatGPT

Awkward. 

Google employees are embarrassed by the company's "rushed, panic" introduction of its chatbot in response to the attention being paid to ChatGPT now owned by Microsoft, which, many believe, makes Google appear weak and behind the curve despite the fact that Google actually invented the key neural network architecture technology powering more intelligent chats. 

Ron Amadeo reports in ars technica:

Google employees are criticizing CEO Sundar Pichai for a ‘rushed, botched’ announcement of Google's new chatbot. Google's announcement of its "Bard" chatbot only gave an overview of planned features, with details so vague anyone could have written them (it's a chatbot inside Google chat that will answer questions!). Google's post included one example answer, and that answer proved to be wrong, earning it an embarrassing correction article in Reuters. One employee wrote, “Rushing Bard to market in a panic validated the market’s fear about us.” Another posted a picture of a dumpster fire with a Google logo on it.

When Google's ChatGPT competitor event was announced for last week, we wrote that it seemed like a rush job designed to reassure investors, and since then, that event happened and went worse than anyone could have imagined. Google's event did the opposite of what it wanted, with the stock down nearly 12 percent since the recent high just before the event. Even Google employees are starting to take notice, with CNBC's Jennifer Elias writing that, internally, employees are criticizing CEO Sundar Pichai for what they call a ‘rushed, botched’ announcement of Google's new chatbot.

CNBC says it was able to view several messages from Google's internal "Memegen" employee forum, and while these are normally lighthearted, the report says "the posts after the Bard announcement struck a more serious tone and even went directly after Pichai."

 

“Dear Sundar," started one post, "the Bard launch and the layoffs were rushed, botched, and myopic. Please return to taking a long-term outlook.” Another highly upvoted post said, "Sundar, and leadership, deserve a Perf NI. They are being comically short sighted and un-Googlely in their pursuit of ‘sharpening focus.’” A "Perf NI" refers to the lowest employee performance rating of "Needs Improvement," as if anyone rates Pichai's performance as CEO.

Google announced the unveiling of a ChatGPT competitor last Wednesday but then made the bizarre decision to spoil that announcement with a blog post two days earlier. The reason, apparently, was that Microsoft had already sent out invites for the ChatGPT-powered 'New Bing' product launch for that Tuesday, preempting Google's announcement by a day, and Google wanted to preempt the preempters.

The two events were intertwined, but they could not have gone more differently. Microsoft announced the "New Bing" on Tuesday and launched a product. It has a lot of rate limits right now, but Bing + ChatGPT is out in the wild, where it will try to condense search results into a readable paragraph and answer questions. It's also integrated into the Microsoft Edge browser, where it can answer questions, help compose something, or summarize a page. It's a real product that people can try.

Google's Monday announcement of its "Bard" chatbot only gave an overview of Google's planned features, with details so vague that anyone could have written them (it's a chatbot inside Google chat that will answer questions!). Google's post included one example answer, and that answer proved to be wrong, earning it an embarrassing correction article in Reuters. The blog post has since been updated with a new example, but it highlighted AI's tendency to generate plausible-sounding but incorrect answers.

 

Google's event didn't include any public product launch of its chatbot technology, opting instead for a private "trusted testers" program. It seemed like the company scrambled to throw this entire event together, so of course it wasn't ready to launch anything, but the back-to-back events only highlighted how far behind Google was. Unlike Microsoft, Google's event was mostly filler, with only five minutes of the 40-minute event dedicated to its ChatGPT competitor, and nearly all of that information was already present in the spoiler blog post on Monday. The rest of the event covered small updates to Google Translate, Maps, and Lens, including a section that had to be skipped after a presenter told the crowd Google had "lost the phone" it needed to do the presentation. The livestream ended with an error message and was marked as "private" on YouTube, so it was unavailable to replay for several hours.

According to the CNBC report, one employee wrote that “Rushing Bard to market in a panic validated the market’s fear about us.” Another posted a picture of a dumpster fire with a Google logo on it, saying it was representative of “How everything’s felt since last year.” Another criticized how stock-focused the company seems to be lately, saying, “Firing 12k people rises the stock by 3%, one rushed AI presentation drops it by 8%.”

The truly embarrassing thing for Google is that it invented the key technology that underpins ChatGPT. The "GPT" in ChatGPT stands for "Generative Pre-trained Transformer," with a "Transformer" being a neural network architecture that was invented and open-sourced by the Google Brain team in 2017. Back then, Google described Transformer as "particularly well suited for language understanding" but never created a product with the technology. ChatGPT's owner, OpenAI, turns AI research into products like ChatGPT and DALL-E that people can actually use, while Google keeps it locked away in a lab. The two events, one with a product launch and one without, only reinforced that narrative last week.