So their interpretation and use of capitalization, punctuation, grammar - and emojis - can be very different from that of digital natives. JL
Abigail Weinberg reports in Mother Jones:
People who started using computers later in life think of internet communication as: “this is a style you use when on a device” “this is how you talk on the internet” Whereas people who grew up using them use different styles: “this is how you indicate irony” “this is playfulness” “this is passive aggression” “this is sincerity” etc. I cannot overstate how much older people have NO IDEA they could possibly be communicating tone of voice, and how much younger people have NO IDEA everyone isn’t constantly communicating tone of voice
In the early 2010s, strange uses of language started cropping up all over the micro-blogging platform Tumblr. A Tumblr user might do ALL THE THINGS, or get major feels, or lose the ability to even. Somehow, everyone understood each other.
One blog, All Things Linguistic, took the language of Tumblr users seriously. Its author, Gretchen McCulloch, gave linguistically informed explanations for the rise of phrases like “I can’t even” and “because [noun].” It was a nonjudgmental haven for Tumblr users who wanted to understand their own online language, which was evolving beneath their fingertips, not to mention for linguistics enthusiasts who simply enjoyed nerdy memes.
McCulloch’s new book, Because Internet, continues in this spirit. It’s a field guide for navigating internet language, written by someone who has been charting these waters on her blog since 2012. Thanks to social media and instant messaging, McCulloch explains, internet users are generating unprecedented amounts and varieties of informal writing. Whether we’re ~signaling irony~ through creative uses of punctuation or LOLing at the bizarre—and I cannot stress this enough—syntactical gymnastics of the latest memes, we’re contributing to the richness of modern language that McCulloch so delights in.
Take, for example, emoji, the little pictorial icons that some pedants have blamed for the decline of the English language. McCulloch posits that emojis act as a form of internet gesture. Sometimes texting a string of emojis to a friend can be a means of commiserating, acknowledging the friend’s message, or simply experiencing a sort of virtual togetherness. Emojis don’t detract from formal language, McCulloch argues. Instead, they add nuance to texted messages that lack the tone of voice, facial expressions, and body language that would color a spoken statement.McCulloch and I spoke recently over Gchat. During the hourlong conversation, we talked about emojis, typographical tone of voice, and why it’s so hard for one generation to communicate with another over text. The interview below has been lightly edited for clarity, but punctuation and capitalization appear as originally written.
So, the idea with this interview is that it’ll be kind of an informal conversation, in the spirit of internet writing
Are we going to add in the periods again, for the written article version? haha
That’s a good question. My rubric is this MoJo article that was done in a similar style, with light editing for clarity
Right, yeah I read that article
Awesome. It doesn’t seem like a lot of punctuation was added there, but that’s something I’d have to check in with my editor about
Yeah, normally if you do an audio interview of course they do add punctuation
But they do have periods at the end of each chat message, which isn’t something I’d normally do
Anyway, feel free to leave the meta conversation in, if you think people would find it interesting! This is literally the kind of thing I think about all the time
I think this is actually sort of a good segue to talk about some of the intergenerational differences in texting, because, as you mention in Because Internet, a lot of young people find periods at the ends of text messages to be passive aggressiveYou mention studying the Beatles’ postcards to see how they use periods…in between short phrases…or sort of to separate thoughts
Yeah, I went looking for archival postcards and turns out the Beatles are a group that lots of people have paid attention to the minutiae of!
I think the thing to note about the passive-aggressive period or ellipsis is that it’s not ALWAYS passive aggressive, it’s that it sometimes gets interpreted as passive aggressive because its meaning gets computed through multiple steps
So, in a context where a period isn’t necessary (ie when you’re sending a single-utterance message rather than a multi-sentence message), putting a period anyway makes a message more final, or more solemn, or more serious
And sometimes that’s not passive aggressive at all!
For example:
Yikes. That’s rough.
Oh no.
Oh no….
In these cases, the period reinforces the negative message that you’re sending
But if you say something likeHope you had a good time.Then there could be the passive aggressive interpretation?Or, see me in my office.
Exactly, so a period (negative) plus a positive or even neutral message, that’s when you get this tension that creates the effect of passive aggression
Sounds good.
Sounds good….
Okay.
Okay…
Or, god forbid, K.
hahahaha the dreaded “K.”
You also mention re: the postcards, that it was common for people to draw doodlesDo you think people who grew up before the internet conceptualize emojis as literal doodles?
Yeah! You get all these great doodles in archival letters and postcards and so on
It sort of just backs the question up further, in that, what do people who use doodles think of them as meaning/doing?
(Which I would love to see a study on, btw)
I do think that there’s a generational divide in how literally people use emoji though
Yeah! My parents use emojis in ways I would never think to use them
Especially since iOS started automatically prompting people with emoji on the keyboard, I think you see this rise in older people putting them in basically whenever they’re being suggested
I think people who started using computers later in life think of internet communication as: “this is a style that you use when on a device” “this is just how you talk on the internet”
Whereas people who grew up using them have more splits in how they use different styles: “this is how you indicate irony” “this is playfulness” “this is passive aggression” “this is sincerity” etc
I cannot overstate how much older people have NO IDEA that they could possibly ever be communicating tone of voice, and how much younger people have NO IDEA that everyone isn’t constantly communicating tone of voice
Right! It’s crazy to me some of the things my parents will text me, not knowing that I would interpret them as ironiclike “10Q” for thank you
WOW
Who even.
that’s something I would only ever use 100% in jest
Is this the 90s
hahaha I guess that’s when they got online, and never changed
I love it
But I feel like you do see a resurgence of some of these older ways of typingAnd I think the boundary between irony and just…normal talking can shift
0 comments:
Post a Comment