Starting with a focus on outcomes rather than activities. JL
Peter Moore reports in his blog:
Digital technology is
the primary source of value creation for nearly every organization
regardless of industry, sector, or geography. (But) less
than 30% of companies have a process in place to measure the return on
investment of their digital technology projects. One
of the biggest mistakes that companies make is to measure activities
not outcomes. (For instance) companies equate cost reductions
with value creation. Much
of value creation comes from new systems of
engagement and systems of intelligence that measure how well you are engaging
customers using these new systems and tools.
As
the old adage says, what gets measured gets done. So, if you are
measuring the wrong things then the wrong things are getting done. Less
than 30% of companies have a process in place to measure the return on
investment of their digital technology projects. As such, this lack of
new measurement tools puts them at a significant competitive
disadvantage as they try to pivot to being a digital enterprise.
KPI’s,
OKR’s, ROI’s, NPS’s are just a few of the traditional acronyms for
measuring different performance goals a company aspires to achieve. The
challenge, however, is to be able to segment performance metrics based
on the different ways a company creates value for its customers,
employees, supply chain partners and other key stakeholders. With that
thought in mind, we have developed a 4 Zone metrics framework that
calls out specific measurement tools for each zone as shown on the
chart below:
|
|
|
New performance metrics that measure the different ways
your company creates value
|
|
|
The
starting point for creating the new metrics that matter for your
company is to ask some core questions:
- What
performance metrics are most critical to how our company creates
value?
- Do
our existing metrics capture this value creation?
- What
new metrics would better incent the behaviors and actions needed
to create value as a digital enterprise?
- How
can we leverage AI and Machine Learning to tell us what are the
key performance drivers that enable our value creation process?
- What
metrics are our key competitors using to measure their
performance?
|
|
|
Measure outcomes not activities
|
|
|
One
of the biggest mistakes that companies make is to measure activities
not outcomes. For example, call centers should measure the percentage
of customer problems solved not how quickly they ended the call. IT
teams, instead of measuring systems uptime should measure the amount of
trapped value (resources and budget) recovered and redeployed to higher
value creation initiatives.
As I
wrote about in my March blog, digital technology is
the primary source of value creation for nearly every organization
regardless of industry, sector, or geography. With the 4 Zones model,
senior leaders can segment their value creation initiatives by zone
where risk and return are spread across multiple value creation
outcomes. As such, it is critical that the metrics that measure the
performance of these initiatives are also segmented by zone. The single
biggest source of failure is when a company uses the metrics in one
zone to measure the desired outcome in another zone.
|
|
|
Using the 4 Zones Model to align value creation outcomes
with the right metrics
|
|
|
Productivity
Zone: Process Metrics
|
|
|
The
primary role of the functions in the productivity zone including
Finance, IT, HR, Marketing, Customer Service, Legal, Procurement,
Compliance, and others is to enable the company’s operating businesses
in the performance zone to meet or exceed their revenue, margin, and
net profits goals. As such, they need to deploy a series of process
improvement metrics that measure their ability to recover resources and
budget trapped in low value creation functions and redeploy them to
higher value functions.
A
big mistake companies make in this zone is to equate cost reductions
with value creation. The true measure of performance in this zone is
how these support functions can leverage digital technology to directly
impact and contribute to increasing revenues, margins, and profits.
Ultimately functions like IT, Marketing, and Customer Service should be
measured as profit centers not cost centers.
|
|
|
Performance
Zone: Investor Metrics
|
|
|
Investors
in public or private companies reward performance that drives
sustainable value creation. The metrics that measure that performance
are agreed upon during the annual planning process and often don’t
reflect the increasing impact digital technologies will have on the
performance of the company’s business units.
Much
of the value creation in this zone comes from utilizing new systems of
engagement and systems of intelligence to deliver exceptional customer
experiences. Depending on whether you are a B2B or B2C business, you
will need to adapt new metrics that measure how well you are engaging
customers using these new systems and tools.
|
|
|
Incubation Zone:
Venture Metrics
|
|
|
The
biggest mistake most companies make is to use traditional performance
zone metrics (e.g. EBITDA) to measure new innovation initiatives.
Success in this zone comes from being able to efficiently identify,
test, and validate multiple next generation products, services, and
ideas. The key performance measures should be speed to market and time
to value.
The
reason many early stage, venture backed companies disrupt well
established companies is because they outperform them in this zone.
They are much better at failing fast and redeploying what they’ve
learned to the next innovation opportunity. As such, the metrics they
use incent that type of behavior.
The
other big mistake in this zone is trying to scale multiple
transformation zone initiatives at the same time. As I’ve said before,
reallocating existing resources and budget from current businesses in
the performance zone to create a net new business that can scale to 10%
of the company’s current revenues is a very disruptive exercise for any
organization. Trying to do more than one is a recipe for failure.
|
|
|
Transformation Zone:
Hypergrowth Metrics
|
|
|
Value
creation in this zone comes from adopting and deploying digital
technologies to do two things:
- Launch
and scale a material net new line of business
- Defend
the company from an existential threat
In
the first case, the key metrics to measure performance should include:
- The
new business will scale to generate a 10% or greater increase in
current revenues and profits for the company
- There
can only be one transformation initiative done at a time
- 50%
of the discretionary compensation of all critical stakeholders is
solely based on the success of this effort
In
the second case, the key metrics to measure performance should include:
- A
commitment to invest in a J Curve to get to an S Curve knowing returns
may take 24 months
- A
compelling business case for investors that will support investing
in the J Curve
To
excel at value creation as a digital enterprise requires segmenting
multiple performance metrics that are aligned with the different ways a
company creates value. Using our 4 Zone metrics framework and toolset
will allow senior leadership teams to maximize the full value creation
potential of their organization. It will also help them avoid the
common mistake of using the wrong metrics to measure the different ways
the company creates and delivers value.
|
|
|
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment