As Streaming Services Raise Prices, Cord-Cutters' Cost Savings Are Shrinking

The strategic question is whether streaming has become so secure that it can withstand the resentment generated by increased prices - or - especially given the fragmentation presented now presented by Netflix, Disney, YouTube, Warner, et al - this gives cable providers a new opening to regain share? JL

Drew FitzGerald reports in the Wall Street Journal:

Online television bundles are getting bigger and prices keep rising, edging closer to the cable bundles they were to replace. The latest price increases come ahead of the introduction of new streaming services from Walt Disney Co. and AT&T plus new entrants such as Apple. That could further fracture online TV and make it harder for consumers to assemble a replacement to cable.Cord-cutters still need a high-speed internet connection that often comes from cable providers, complicating the equation. "YouTube were supposed to disrupt big cable but are instead becoming more like it."
Online television bundles are getting bigger and prices keep rising, edging closer to the cable bundles they were designed to replace and muddling the economic equation that has prompted millions of Americans to cut the cord.
YouTube TV, started two years ago as a lower-cost alternative to cable, said this week it was raising its monthly rate by $10 to $50 and adding channels such as HGTV and Food Network. T-Mobile US Inc., TMUS +0.09% a wireless carrier that has been looking to jump into the video business, said it would start selling a $100 monthly home-TV service with more than 275 available channels.

The latest price increases come ahead of the introduction of new streaming services from media heavyweights such as Walt Disney Co. and AT&T Inc.’s WarnerMedia plus new entrants such as Apple Inc. that could further fracture online TV and make it harder for consumers to assemble a replacement to traditional cable.
Disney unveiled details of a new video subscription service on Thursday, highlighting programming being made for the service based on franchises such as “High School Musical” and “Toy Story.” The service will cost $6.99 a month and be launched in November.
Hulu and  Alphabet Inc. -owned YouTube are among a host of companies that have tried to pry loose the cable companies’ decadeslong grip on live TV by launching slimmer bundles of channels tailored to what individual customers want to watch. But as programmers have raised the fees they charge to carry their channels, the online services have had a harder time holding down prices.
Programming costs aren’t guaranteed to increase. AT&T recently negotiated reduced rates with Viacom Inc. to air channels such as Comedy Central and MTV, according to people familiar with the matter. Prices for AT&T’s DirecTV and U-verse services haven’t declined as a result, however.
Streaming services Sling TV, DirecTV Now and Hulu, which have signed up millions of subscribers in recent years, have all raised the price of their lowest-tier live-TV packages over the past year. Customers can easily disconnect or cancel the services. Providers can likewise quickly change prices and channel packages.
AT&T executives have said they knew DirecTV Now’s higher price would drive away some customers, but needed to make the service profitable. Rate increases at Hulu and YouTube TV were “more opportunistic,” UBS analyst Batya Levi said. “YouTube and Hulu are the only ones that are growing right now,” she said. “There was a little bit of money left on the table” after their rivals raised prices.
YouTube TV, which started with about 40 broadcast and cable channels, now has over 70 and costs 43% more than it did at launch.
“We’ve been working to build a package that fits your needs,” YouTube TV Vice President Christian Oestlien wrote in a blog post detailing the change and eight new channels from Discovery Communications Inc. The cheaper, so-called skinny bundle that drew its earliest customers is no longer available.
YouTube TV charges members billed through Apple a $5 monthly surcharge, joining a group of services changing their pricing or availability in Apple’s App Store in response to the company’s policy of taking 30% of all purchases through its payment system.
The price increase disappointed Kaushik Ghate, an early YouTube TV adopter from San Mateo, Calif., who said he signed onto the web service both to save money and out of distaste for cable providers. Now that prices are closer together and Comcast Corp.’s Xfinity app has improved, he said his decision is a toss-up.
“I am feeling let down by YouTube, as if they were supposed to disrupt big cable” but are instead becoming more like it, he said. “I will wait a couple of months, but now will be open to ‘switching.’”
Hulu, whose owners include Disney and Comcast, illustrated a widening gap between on-demand brands and cablelike bundles that carry live sports and news. The website in January lopped $2 off the monthly cost of its basic library of situation comedies and original dramas but added $5 a month to its live-TV package. Hulu + Live TV, which has more than 60 channels and includes limited advertising, now costs $45 a month.
Dish Network Corp.’s Sling TV and AT&T’s DirecTV Now are owned by traditional pay-TV companies wary of wounding their most lucrative business. Both services have signed up millions of new subscribers while their satellite brands lose customers, but the growth comes at a cost to their bottom lines.
Like Disney, AT&T is preparing to launch new on-demand services later this year, as the two companies seek to compete with Netflix Inc., which has also recently raised its monthly fees.
Apple previewed its TV app last month in a star-studded presentation, but didn’t disclose what programming it might carry or what it would cost.
Online TV still undercuts traditional cable- and satellite-TV subscriptions by avoiding service fees and charges for add-ons such as DVR rentals. While U.S. television households with pay-TV services fell to about 78% last year, off from 87% in 2008, the amount they spend on such services hasn’t, according to annual surveys by industry tracker Leichtman Research Group. The average home spent $107 a month on pay-TV service in 2018, according to Leichtman’s phone survey of 1,100 adults last fall.
Cord-cutters still need a high-speed internet connection that often comes from cable providers, complicating the equation. Those providers typically discount broadband service when it is packaged with television, but the price jumps when it is sold by itself.
T-Mobile last year paid $325 million to buy Layer3 TV, a cablelike service offered in a few cities, with the goal of designing a nationwide mobile video service for its cellphone customers. But the service has struggled to gain the carriage rights it needs to air many channels, said people familiar with the matter.
T-Mobile’s service, rebranded TVision Home, is limited to eight cities, including Chicago, Los Angeles and New York. The cellphone carrier’s customers can get a $10 monthly discount, but its total cost approaches those from competing cable services and doesn’t include a broadband connection. Like a traditional cable feed, it requires a set-top box connected to a television. The wireless carrier says a mobile version of the service is still in the pipeline.
“That’s not very disruptive,” BTIG analyst Walt Piecyk wrote in a note to clients. “T-Mobile is offering a service that is nearly identical to those from existing providers, even down to the remote control, which actually has legacy cable buttons of red, green, yellow and blue.”