Research: When Uber and Lyft Launch In New Cities Fatal Crashes Increase

The 'what' is interesting. The 'why' is far more important. It may be that a surge of drivers with relatively little experience or training in the craft of being a chauffeur who are attempting to compete for business could be the cause. It may also be that a combination of factors - such as lower gas prices - led to an increase in overall miles driven, to which ride-hailing may have been but one contributing factor.  

But the data suggest that the numbers are what they are - whatever the reason - and that that means the societal costs of ride hailing are higher than the companies and their financial backers would have us believe. JL

Graham Rapier reports in Business Insider:

The arrival of ridesharing is associated with an increase of 2-3% in the number of motor vehicle fatalities and fatal accidents - "an economically meaningful increase." It may be too soon to tell whether the effect is a short-term adjustment or a longer-term pattern. The study leaves out an important correlation between lower gas prices and increased driving on crash rates. It's possible the accidents are not related to ride-hailing.
In the years before Uber and Lyft started popping up in cities across the United States, deadly car accidents were at record lows.
By 2010, just before the ride-hailing services began to expand en masse, the total number of traffic fatalities sank to 32,885 nationwide, the lowest number since 1949, according to government data. But once Uber and Lyft began aggressively expanding, the authors of a yet-to-be-published study have found, those fatal accidents began to slowly rise once again.
"The arrival of ridesharing is associated with an increase of 2-3% in the number of motor vehicle fatalities and fatal accidents," researchers John Barrios of the University of Chicago along with Yael Hochberg and Livia Hanyi Yi of Rice University, write in a draft of their paper, which is in the preliminary stages of publication.
To examine the effect of ride-hailing on traffic safety, the researchers first took official statistics from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and overlaid them with the dates Uber or Lyft began operating in a specific city. The authors then looked at accident rates in those cities per vehicle miles traveled (VMT).
Not surprisingly, VMT increased dramatically once Uber launched in San Francisco in 2010, quickly followed by other competitors, thanks in part to the miles drivers travel between the end of one fare and picking up another passenger. In New York, a study found this year, drivers travel an average of 2.8 miles between fares.
"Using the staggered introduction of ridesharing across U.S. cities, we show that its introduction in a metropolitan area leads to an economically meaningful increase in overall motor vehicle fatalities," the paper says. "This increase is consistent with acknowledged macro trends in motor vehicle accidents."
To be sure, the study is concerned with total vehicle traffic in a given city and time, so its possible that the accidents are not related to any ride-hailing driver. The researchers add that it "may be too soon to tell whether the effect we document is a short-term adjustment or a longer-term pattern."
Both Uber and Lyft pushed back against the study's findings, with each company calling the study's findings "deeply flawed."
'Uber has contributed to safety in many ways and we take our responsibility to help keep people safe seriously," an Uber spokesperson told Business Insider. For Lyft, a spokesperson said "the safety and protection of everyone on the road is our top priority."
Joe Cortright, an economist and president of consulting firm Impresa, points out in City Observer that the study leaves out an important correlation between lower gas prices and increased driving on crash rates. He says the study "raises important and provocative questions" but that more analysis is needed — exactly what the researchers hope will happen with their paper.
"Our findings may be a reason to reframe the discussion around cities' response to the rapid growth of ridesharing," the study says. "While much of the resistance to ridesharing has been presented as a case of entrenched incumbents (taxis) seeking rents, our findings suggest considerable societal costs are also at play."
The findings, even if disputed by ride-hailing giants, will add to a growing list of research around ridesharing and the entire gig economy. It could also serve as more fuel for those pushing for further caps on ridesharing, like New York's city council passed in August. Despite loud opposition from the companies, new ride-hailing driver permits will be halted after the legislative body's 36-6 approval of the bill, which also requires Uber and Lyft to ensure drivers receive a minimum wage.