A Blog by Jonathan Low

 

Nov 12, 2014

How Organizations Are Getting Employees to Agree To Have Their Movements Tracked

Is there any issue more fraught with issues of mistrust, resentment and fear than tracking employee performance - and especially their movements?

Ever since pioneering efficiency expert Frank Gilbreth wrote Cheaper by the Dozen about his time and motion studies in the first part of the 20th century and Westinghouse Corporation conducted its famous Hawthorne experiments at one of its many factories outside Chicago, the study of how people do what they do has been a battleground. Employees believe they are being spied upon with the ultimate goal being either to reduce their pay for the same work completed - or simply to eliminate their jobs in favor of machines.

And really, who can blame them? History suggests that just because they were - or are - paranoid doesn't mean some boss isn't out to get them.

Businesses, meanwhile, believing themselves to be under perpetual attack, especially in a global economy, want to do whatever they can to improve productivity and margins.

In the digital era, the ability to generate and then move data expeditiously from research to analysis to implication means that tracking employees can be done faster than ever - and that the results may inspire quicker action. This may enhance resistance, but as the following article explains, if the request to study employee movements is managed with intelligent communication, the outcome can be mutually beneficial for managers and those who work for them. JL

Derrick Harris reports in GigaOm:

One of the biggest things was just bringing employees into the discussion from the beginning and asking how the data that location sensors would collect could help them do their jobs.
Hospitals are a natural fit for sensors, but one of most important things hospitals can track is the behavior of their staffs. Where nurses and doctors hang out, how they move about the hospital and how much time they spend with patients can have a big effect on personnel costs. And, of course, knowing who was where, whether they washed their hands and who they contacted can be of the utmost importance in order to track down causes of or help prevent hospital-borne illnesses.
Ashley Simmons, director of performance improvement at Florida Hospital Celebration Health, explained how her hospital was able to overcome the inherent big-brother concerns with tracking staff and actually find some really interesting insights. One of the biggest things was just bringing employees into the discussion from the beginning and asking how the data that location sensors would collect could help them do their jobs. As the program matured and expanded, nurses and doctors are kept in the loop to ensure everything is still working.
“It was a journey of culture,” Simmons said, contrasting the inclusive approach to the top-down one historically employed by hospital management.Another big cultural change had to do with bringing in some new blood that understood data, but didn’t see the world through health-care-industry-colored glasses. “I didn’t want that same mentality,” Simmons said. So she hired a data analyst from Facebook who had lots of experiences conducting research experiments and analyzing lots of data, but was able to look outside the box to search for correlations that hospital lifers might not think to consider.
The results of all the data collection and analysis have been very positive, Simmons said, and actually pretty interesting. The hospital has designed new units based on employee movement patterns and builds patient-care teams based in part on the personalities of the people involved (where people spend their downtime, for example, can suggest how introverted or extroverted they are). When staff have rude encounters, she said the hospital learned, “the potential for you to make a mistake goes up exponentially.”

0 comments:

Post a Comment