The initial allegation in this cautionary tale was that according to a routine required US Securities and Exchange Commission filing, Twitter copped to the fact that 23 million of its ostensible users were actually bots.
This garnered some attention, though it must be said that given the quality of many submissions in the average Twitter feed, it was hardly a surprise - and could actually be a pretty interesting take on advances in our ability to use technology to express current opinions based on past exclamations. By this standard, the human antecedents of any number of politicians around the world could legitimately be questioned. But we digress.
Twitter, however, took these reports - 'misinterpretations' - by its lights, as a threat to its quality, veracity and stock price value. So it issued a refutation whose rhetorical arabesques and narrative flourishes could only be described as obfuscatory. Not that anyone thinks Twitter is trying to cloud the truth, but that this is the natural end product of a discussion in which lawyers, marketers, technicians attempt to come up with a logical explanation - for anything.
At some point someone will figure out how to effectively express what this means and will also, presumably, be paid a lot of money to make it go away. In the meantime, as the following article all too clearly articulates, less is more. JL
Jack Linshi reports in Time:
While it’s difficult to know accurately if apps can also auto-post content, the statistic’s focus was on only apps that aggregate Twitter content automatically “with no user action involved."
0 comments:
Post a Comment