The
conservative estimates start at $100 billion. The optimists put it in the $150-175 billion range. One guy is claiming it's closer to $245 billion.
All of this for a Chinese internet company many Americans and Europeans have never heard of.
The calculations are based on a range of methodologies that sound reasonable in theory. But then when has reasonable ever mattered when the traders and jobbers are in full throat and sensing a payday? It is as Tom Wolfe wrote in
Bonfire of the Vanities about an earlier iteration of this mania, 'the sound of young white men baying for money.'
Alibaba will probably be the largest IPO in history, supplanting Facebook's brief and troubled hold on that dubious title. There are plenty of sensible metrics to be applied, for anyone who wants to try. But the larger story is really about the conflation of two memes bearing almost insupportable expectations: the internet and China.
The 'net has ruled this economy for almost a generation. Untold fortunes have been made from its power to transform. At the same time, China's emergence as a global economic force, along with the size of its domestic market which has for centuries lured the ambitious and foolhardy, has now combined to create a financial allure of surpassing excitement. Imagine melding the largest internet company in the world with the largest market in the world - and throw in several tens or hundreds of billions to optimize the opportunity.
That is where the value lies. Whether the company will ever realize that potential is almost beside the point. JL
Jennifer Hughes and colleagues report in the Financial Times:
In days, investors will have an answer to the most popular
guessing game in the world's markets right now: just what is Alibaba really
worth and on what basis are those numbers calculated?
The Chinese e-commerce
giant is expected soon to file its initial documents for a public offering in
the U.S., revealing for the first time what goes on inside a company estimated
to control 80 percent of China's e-commerce market.
Unusually for such a large and visible company, current estimates of its
value range from the $80 billion implied by some synthetic securities to the
$150 billion-plus suggested by optimistic analysts comparing it to other highly
valued internet stocks - and come in spite of the drubbing tech stocks have
suffered in the past month.
Synthetic securities
Impatient for the initial public offering, some hedge funds in Hong Kong have
taken to buying certificates from investment banks designed to mimic the
performance of Alibaba shares, or have simply created their own.
(
Read more: Five things you should know about Alibaba)
It works by taking long positions in Alibaba's main listed shareholders -
Japan's
SoftBank
and
Yahoo of the U.S. - and
then trying to isolate their stake in Alibaba through short positions. For
example, SoftBank, which holds more than a third of Alibaba, also owns a
sizeable chunk of U.S. mobile operator
Sprint as well as online gaming companies GungHo and
Supercell.
For unlisted businesses - such as SoftBank's main telecoms unit - investors
short out a similar publicly traded entity, such at Japanese rival
KDDI. The process is
part art, part science, and ultimately educated guess work.
Either way, the instrument is highly volatile. In the past year, the
yen-denominated index has been almost double the current level, and almost half
it - largely due to swings in the Japanese stock market rather than expectations
over Alibaba's true size. But thanks to the mix of long and short positions it
has not tumbled in line with global tech sector stocks over the past two months.
Even after recent falls, both SoftBank and Yahoo have both enjoyed share
price rallies of around 130 percent since Alibaba sold its convertible bond in
September 2012.
Convertible bonds
Would-be buyers of Alibaba's unlisted shares and convertible bonds have
recently been making offers that value the group at $120 billion-$150 billion,
according to bondholders and others involved in the market.
That is a sharp contrast to 2012, when Alibaba issued the $1.6 billion
convertible bond to a small group of investors including Singapore's Temasek and
GIC.
At the time, Alibaba was valued at less than $40 billion, two people with
direct knowledge of the situation said. Under the terms of the deal, the bond
will convert into equity upon completion of an IPO.
One share sale in February showed how dramatically its valuation has already
changed. U.S. investment fund Tiger Global bought a stake in Alibaba from Giant
Interactive Group, a Chinese games developer. The sale valued Alibaba at around
$128 billion, according to calculations by Reuters. Investors with knowledge of
the transaction say the actual valuation was slightly higher after accounting
for fees and the structure of the deal, which went in part through Yunfeng
Capital, a private equity fund co-founded by Alibaba's founder Jack Ma.
However, the valuation reflected by such share sales is complicated by the
fact that the market is highly illiquid. Investors say many hedge funds trying
to buy shares are unable to find a seller, even at valuations close to $150
billion.
More from the Financial Times:
Still, the implied threefold gain in Alibaba's valuation follows a
substantial rise in the share prices of its publicly traded rivals such as
Tencent and
Baidu. Much of those
gains, equity analysts say, are because investors are increasingly confident
that tech companies in the U.S. and elsewhere have proven that they can profit
from smartphone users.
Multiples
Comparing Alibaba to its peers is in theory the most simple and reliable form
of valuation. The problem is the lack of information on Alibaba - and a dearth
of truly comparable companies.
The most cited examples are
Facebook, Tencent and
Amazon. The first is the
least similar business but like Alibaba it is something of a phenomenon, the
second works if investors believe that all big Chinese internet companies are
similar and the last actually sells goods but using a very different model to
Alibaba.
Rakuten,
the Japanese online retailer, is probably the straightest comparison since, like
Alibaba, it operates a marketplace in which it charges fees, rather than selling
its own goods - the model that makes up the bulk of Amazon's business. It does,
however, own a baseball team.
The only information investors have on Alibaba, until it files with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, come from the quarterly updates of Yahoo,
its one-quarter owner. These give basic profit details. Yahoo's latest update,
last week, showed that Alibaba had a bumper end to 2013, a year in which it
produced $3.5 billion in profits.
Facebook trades on 100 times last year's earnings while Amazon is valued at a
dizzying 500 times. Tencent and Rakuten are on 50 and 40 times, respectively.
Applying those multiples to Alibaba's 2013 earnings makes it worth between $141
billion and $1.76 trillion. That last number is ridiculous. But comparing
Alibaba to Rakuten produces $141 billion and $176 billion - bang in the range
that the more optimistic analysts have bandied about.
0 comments:
Post a Comment