It just makes sense. The tech by-words about distributed computing, the cloud, mobility and convergence all suggest a broad, adaptive economic eco-system capable of taking inputs from anywhere and then selling their reconfigured outputs everywhere.
So why does everyone still have to troop to northern California to seek credibility and contacts?
Well, the reality is that they don't. Sure, it helps to validate the efficacy of the talent and effort involved, but in this economy, The Valley will come to you - through investment, partnership, licensing, acquisition or plain ol' networking.
The emergence of mobility is an outcome, not just a descriptor. Silicon Valley remains the largest repository of talent, financing and capabilities, but the distributive capacity of the global net means that ideas, money, people and customers can all be scaled. There have long been stories about Silicon Gulch (the Austin, Texas area), Silicon Glen (Scotland), Silicon Alley (New York). But now Silicon Allee (Berlin), Silicon Wadi (Israel) and even talk of Silicon Vikings (the Nordic countries). All of this 'Silicon' imagery is silly but it serves to illustrate the evidence and the opportunity.
Growing the market has long been a goal of the industry: the more people who have access as a first step, but then increasing the numbers of those capable of using, improving and deepening both the market and the technology itself is a benefit that will ultimately drive the business and its ability to enhance and empower. JL
Richard Waters and Richard Milne report in the Financial Times:
The rise of mobile computing has fostered a fresh round of tech start-ups
around the world, turning cities like Stockholm, Tel Aviv and Berlin into
magnets for entrepreneurs hoping to cash in on the boom in smartphone and tablet
computing.
But even amid the biggest wave of global interest in new consumer technology
start-ups since the dotcom bubble at the end of the 1990s, Silicon Valley still
retains a huge lead when it comes to cultivating the next generation of online
leaders, according to many of the entrepreneurs and venture capitalists
involved.
The rise of mobile computing – along with the “cloud”, or back-end
infrastructure, that supports the swarm of new computing devices – has created
big new tech markets for international entrepreneurs, while also freeing them
from some of the constraints that once made it hard to build freestanding
businesses.
“Now the app stores have come along and all of a sudden it is possible to
reach a billion consumers by just submitting your game to the app store,” said
Ilkka Paananen, chief executive of Supercell, the Finnish games company.
In one of the most dramatic demonstrations of the instant
fortunes now possible, the three-year-old Supercell recently
sold
a 51 per cent stake in itself for $1.5bn to Japanese investors
SoftBank and
GungHo Online Entertainment. Other Scandinavian start-ups to ride the mobile
boom include music subscription service Spotify, which was recently
valued
at $4bn, and Rovio, maker of Angry Birds, leading to hopes that a new
generation of companies will
emerge
to replace fading handset maker
Nokia.
Israel’s well established start-up sector was also given a
big lift in 2013 from the rise of mobile, with
Google paying
$1bn for mobile traffic app Waze. The acquisitions extended to the new
technologies needed to support mobile computing, such as
Facebook’s purchase
of data compression company Onavo and
Apple’s
acquisition
of Primesense, whose sensors are used to control computers by gesture.
Highly visible successes like these, and the low costs of creating apps for
mobile platforms, have brought entrepreneurs to the world’s start-up hubs,
echoing the surge of enthusiasm in consumer internet companies during the dotcom
boom. The earlier bubble quickly popped, however, after the dotcom groups failed
to live up to their high valuations.
Since then, cities like London and New York have made concerted efforts to
build more durable start-up ecosystems. In part, that has involved turning to
entrenched local industries like fashion, retail and finance to foster internet
companies that can draw on skills beyond pure technology.
However, entrepreneurs and investors in some of these centres say that the
hottest prospects are still often drawn to Silicon Valley or sell out before
they can realise much of their potential. A shortage of finance to support fast
growing companies beyond their early seed stages, along with the lack of a deep
labour pool, are the most common reasons cited.
“All these markets have the potential, they have the infrastructure – but
they never seem to capture it the way the Valley does,” said Dave Zilberman of
Comcast Ventures, the investment arm of the US cable TV company, who left New
York and joined the brain-drain to California in 2013 to be closer to the
action.
Long-running attempts around the world to build tech hubs to rival Silicon
Valley have failed to make a dent in the lead enjoyed by California, added John
Hennessy, president of Stanford University and a director of Google. “If
anything, the gap has actually opened. The fact is that this is the core of the
technology world.”
1 comments:
Its not just Bangalore or California now we have other upcoming tech hubs that shall change the world.
Post a Comment