We usually discuss adaptation in the context of globally-oriented enterprises embracing or failing to understand the need to incorporate the differences that new cultures present. But there is a flip side to that, as well.
In their ambitious attempts to grasp the essence of the vast new markets they hope to win over, institutions sometimes lose sight of those factors that helped direct and define them.
There are few companies that embody the possibility of global commerce more than Ikea. Founded in the relatively small market of Sweden, progenitor of quirky but inexpensive and ultimately accessible designs, the company's cheeky advertising campaign when it entered the US over two decades ago - 'it's a big country, somebody's got to furnish it' - perfectly embodies its optimistic spirit and clever understanding of the way to overcome the challenges that a potentially alien culture might present.
Ikea has gone on to conquer new realms, not the least of which is China. It is discovering that people disparate markets find something comfortable about the company and its deceptively simple design standards. But as the following article explains, the company may be at risk if it loses - by choice or neglect - the parts of its essence if it jettisons too much of what got it where it is. The acutely original attributes that contributed so essentially to its global success are precisely the sort of intangible assets that businesses sometimes abandon when they have convinced themselves they now have a 'global' formula for growth. And it is precisely those unique elements that are the most difficult to imagine, replicate - and substitute when attempting to attract new customers. JL
Richard Milne reports in the Financial Times:
The prize of getting access to the wallets of the growing middle classes in
places such as India and China is a big one for Ikea. But it needs to ensure its
southern Swedish values are not compromised to get there.
When Ikea entered the US in a big way in the 1990s, its executives were
bemused by the number of vases they were selling. Slowly it dawned on workers at
the Swedish retailer that Americans were buying them not to put flowers in, but
to drink from: the European-style glasses Ikea stocked were just too small for
US tastes.
That cultural misstep – along with others such as mattresses that were too
hard and measured in centimetres, not king or queen size – was soon corrected.
But the tension between the Swedish heart of the world’s biggest furniture
retailer and its far-flung outposts remains.
The latest demonstration came last week when
French
prosecutors placed the company and its two top executives in the country
under formal investigation over spying allegations.
The probe is focusing on claims that Ikea’s managers in France illegally
obtained police records of their employees to check if they had dodgy pasts.
According to people familiar with the investigation, it is less concerned with
another alleged spying angle uncovered: that Ikea may have used private
detectives to check up on disgruntled customers.
Ikea itself says it is committed to finding out exactly
what went wrong and putting it right. But the investigation – and a number of
other controversies involving the flat-pack furniture group around the world –
highlights the challenges for Ikea as it aims to
double
its revenues by 2020 to €50bn by growing rapidly into
new
countries such as India and Egypt.
Founded in the small town of Älmhult in a province known
as the Bible belt of Sweden,
Ikea
has maintained a strong culture rooted in that thrifty and moral background.
Co-workers, as Ikea calls its staff, are recruited heavily on values and beliefs
rather than purely skills or experience.
Visitors to Älmhult are sometimes unnerved by what former Ikea executive
Johan Stenebo has described as a cult-like atmosphere: the Ikea hotel in the
town has two bedside books, the Bible and an Ikea catalogue.
Ikea’s founding tract in many ways is the 1976 manifesto
of its founder Ingvar Kamprad,
“The Testament of a Furniture
Dealer”. It contains slogans such as “Expensive solutions to any kind of
problem are usually the work of mediocrity”, and “Only while sleeping one makes
no mistakes”.
The culture has certainly contributed to
Ikea becoming one of
the most successful retailers globally, avoiding some of the severe problems
companies such as Walmart, Carrefour and Tesco have experienced in their efforts
to expand internationally.
But both current and former executives question if the Swedish group will be
able to keep that culture intact as it expands into ever more countries and ups
its number of store openings.
Senior Ikea executives acknowledge that adapting the company’s culture to
national norms is a huge challenge. Controversies such as that in France offer
good potential for lessons, they add.
The prize of getting access to
the wallets of the growing middle classes in places such as India and China is a
big one for Ikea
Ikea was rolling out a new global code of conduct at the time and implemented
it in France first with exercises with all employees. It also put in a new legal
department, risk manager and compliance rules in France.
Similarly, with its product range Ikea is imposing a slightly less
one-size-fits-all approach. Most of its furniture is the same whether in the
Dominican Republic or China, but there are a few country-specific products where
it makes sense. Store managers also have the freedom to arrange the example
bedrooms, kitchens and living rooms on the top floor of Ikea shops as they see
fit, taking into account local sensitivities.
Mr Kamprad and his former assistant, Ikea’s new chief
executive
Peter
Agnefjäll, seem more aware of the dangers than most. The company still aims
to increase the number of store openings from what Mr Agnefjäll describes as a
record low last year of five. But it has abandoned a plan to up the pace to
20-25 a year, a speed that
worried
Mr Kamprad, who favoured 10-12.
Many older Ikea managers remember the indigestion that followed previous
expansion drives such as the one into the US.
0 comments:
Post a Comment