Can Intelligence Really Be Measured?

Oh, yeah, sure, no problem. Intelligence can totally be measured.

There are just two simple questions that have to be answered first: what do you mean by intelligence and what are you trying to measure?

Assuming you have that all figured out, just get back to us with a scale or a ruler. Oh, and your credit card.

So seriously, folks, what exactly is it that we are trying to accomplish by attempting such measurements? Is an absolute basis of intellectual superiority the goal? And assuming you could get agreement on that, what purpose would it serve other than adding to the list of obnoxious personal accountrements like flashy cars or big jewelry?

Or if the objective is to predict success, how come so many people who attend supposedly inferior educational institutions do so well in life while many of those who were accepted by elite fonts of academia struggle?

And as if that were not enough, can intelligence be taught or improved upon? Or is it innate and simply the luck of the genetic draw?

We wish we had answers for you. But as the following article explains, perhaps it is best that we do not. Such methods, as well as the sources of data can be adulterated. The uses of the knowledge that might emerge can be misinterpreted or, worse yet, misued. In short, sometimes not knowing the precise answer to every question has its advantages. JL

Emily Sohn reports in Discovery:

Intelligence tests were designed before anyone had come up with a specific definition of what they were trying to measure.
Every year, the MacArthur Foundation bestows large financial grants on a group of people who are doing exceptionally creative or important work.
MacArthur fellowships are often called “genius grants,” and grant-winners tend to be unusually motivated, passionate and forward thinking. But are they geniuses? The annual conversation that ensues raises questions about what it means to be intelligent and whether that’s something that can be cultivated, measured or even defined.
Despite decades of research into how different brains work, experts said, there are no easy answers. Scientists now know that there are multiple types of intelligence. There's a strong genetic component to certain aspects of intelligence. And scores on intelligence tests are tightly linked to school performance, future income level, health and more.
But IQ scores are far from the only factor that determines how well people do in life. Also, conversations about innate differences in intelligence continue to make people uneasy, probably because there is a long history of racism, classism, sexism and even religious discrimination tied up in discussions about who is smarter than whom. “The field is just fraught with controversy after controversy,” said Randall Engle, a psychologist at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta. “There are group differences all over the place in intelligence measures and that just adds to the controversy. It’s hard for the field to come to grips with what’s understandable about this in the midst of all this craziness.”
Researchers have been interested in understanding the nature of intelligence since at least the 1800s, but early studies were hampered by complications.

British scientist Sir Francis Galton, who was the first to use statistics to test whether intelligence could be inherited, was also a eugenicist, and beliefs that good traits were inborn led to forced sterilizations and other terrible outcomes.
In the early 1900s, French psychologist Alfred Binet developed a test to identify children who might need extra help in school, and his work was incorporated into the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, which originally focused on verbal skills. That and other modern IQ tests have changed over the years as new research changes our understanding of what intelligence is.
Generally, Engle said, different IQ tests correlate well with each other and scores tend to be linked to real-world outcomes. Compared to people who score lower on the tests, for example, people with the highest IQs file more patents, publish more academic papers, and earn higher incomes.
But scoring well on an IQ test doesn’t predict success, nor does a relatively average or lower score predict a life of misery.
That’s because having a high IQ is like owning a car with a big engine, said David Lubinksi, psychologist and co-director of the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn.

“If there’s no gas in your car you’re not going to go anywhere. If road conditions are bad, you’re not going to go anywhere,” he said. In the case of intelligence, you need good health, hard work and motivation to take advantage of inherent brainpower.
Another complication is that intelligence comes in many forms. One category is crystallized intelligence, Engle said, which measures how much knowledge a person has acquired and that is highly correlated to education level.
On the flip side is fluid intelligence, which is the ability to reason and solve new problems. Studies of twins show that fluid intelligence is largely genetic. Identical twins are much more similar to each other on measures of fluid intelligence than fraternal twins are.
But, according to recent research, that is true only for people with high socioeconomic status, at least in the United States, where access to education varies by zip code. In other words, genes only kick in to influence IQ when people are already getting a relatively good education. As scientists learn more about the components of intelligence, they are developing new ways to assess nuances in the way people think.
Traditional IQ tests have long focused on math and verbal skills, Lubinksi said. Now, though, it’s becoming clear that the ability to think spatially and rotate shapes in the mind’s eye is essential for pilots, orthopedic surgeons, architects and other occupations. Some newer tests evaluate those visualization skills.
Even as testing gets more refined, debates continue about whether IQ tests should be used at all. The military has used intelligence testing as a way to place people in the toughest posts, and experts said that evaluations can be useful in professional and educational settings, too -- as long as they’re used responsibly and sensitively.
For kids who are struggling in school, for instance, IQ tests can help determine whether they’re so intelligent that they’re bored or if they have cognitive deficits that require special attention. Determining mental strengths and weaknesses can also help teachers tailor education and steer students towards jobs that best fit their skills.
On the other hand, experts said, it wouldn’t be a good idea to test every child’s IQ and announce the number because that would unnecessarily and unfairly shape expectations.
“It’s like every other tool,” Lubinski said. “It can cause harm, and it can be of great service. There are examples of both.”
As for MacArthur fellows, IQ tests have nothing to do with who wins and “genius” is probably not the right word, Engle said.
“I know two MacArthur award winners,” he said. “They’re pretty normal people who have done some interesting things.”