Despite its omnipresence in web life, there has always been something
ephemeral about Google. It's familiar to us, with its colorful logo and
slightly less colorful founders, but its physical presence in our lives
is hard to quantify or describe.
We use it, but dont often consciously pay for it. We rely on the information it provides, the directions it gives us and even the way it has changed the way we research everything from school papers to deals on used cars. All without vetting or even paying much attention to the dominant role it plays in the way we now function. But we dont really touch it - and strategists at the company are evidently beginning to wonder if that is a drawback.
Apple has its products and its highly visible, even iconic retail locations. We have purchased Microsoft products for decades (albeit not always happily), and Amazon ships real stuff to us.
So Google is starting to evolve away from its 'Google Inside' Intel-derivative strategy to a high-touch, 'let's get physical' approach. The Android phones were step one, though the degree of separation remains. Google glasses were a highly publicized debut for the product strategy as has been the follow-on driverless car.
The company is now taking a next, more declarative step by going full retail. It has announced it will open stores by year-end. There are already Google boutiques being used to gather information, test design concepts and to actually sell merchandise.
What is interesting is the counter-intuitive nature of the move. As the world becomes more comfortable with - and dependent on - a mobile, online approach to sales, opening stores would appear to be a kind of throw-back tactic intended to promote the brand while maybe pushing some t-shirts and phones on the side. But Apple is doing @$50 million a year at each of its retail locations and has a far higher market cap than Google. All of which suggests that what's old really is new and that there might just be something to this cyclicality thing. JL
Alyson Shontell reports in Business Insider:
We use it, but dont often consciously pay for it. We rely on the information it provides, the directions it gives us and even the way it has changed the way we research everything from school papers to deals on used cars. All without vetting or even paying much attention to the dominant role it plays in the way we now function. But we dont really touch it - and strategists at the company are evidently beginning to wonder if that is a drawback.
Apple has its products and its highly visible, even iconic retail locations. We have purchased Microsoft products for decades (albeit not always happily), and Amazon ships real stuff to us.
So Google is starting to evolve away from its 'Google Inside' Intel-derivative strategy to a high-touch, 'let's get physical' approach. The Android phones were step one, though the degree of separation remains. Google glasses were a highly publicized debut for the product strategy as has been the follow-on driverless car.
The company is now taking a next, more declarative step by going full retail. It has announced it will open stores by year-end. There are already Google boutiques being used to gather information, test design concepts and to actually sell merchandise.
What is interesting is the counter-intuitive nature of the move. As the world becomes more comfortable with - and dependent on - a mobile, online approach to sales, opening stores would appear to be a kind of throw-back tactic intended to promote the brand while maybe pushing some t-shirts and phones on the side. But Apple is doing @$50 million a year at each of its retail locations and has a far higher market cap than Google. All of which suggests that what's old really is new and that there might just be something to this cyclicality thing. JL
0 comments:
Post a Comment