We have spent the last three years contemplating the impact of destructive behavior that was ostensibly legal, so how much worse can actual crime be?
It turns out the impact is significant according to the latest figures from the UN. But the larger question is how we define crime and criminal behavior. The issue may be that our values have changed. Much of the crime is not of the traditional variety, which was often conducted by career criminals who were part of established networks. In the past, criminals, when caught, were often abashed and sometimes contrite. Now they angle for TV reality show contracts and run for public office.
The problem may be that our definition of criminal behavior has been changed by the end of the cold war and the rise of a technologically driven economy in which the winners have so dominated the losers that an 'anything goes, they got theirs I want mine' mentality prevails. And it is not limited to the less fortunate. If anything, the affluent who are afraid of losing their advantages seem more inclined to redefining self-interest than do the less well-educated or socially advantaged.
As long as an influential minority see opportunity outweighing risk, this will continue. And the opposition to limiting even legal risk suggests that time is not going to come anytime soon. JL
The Huffington Post reports
Criminals are making out like bandits with a sizable chunk of the world's economy.
Criminal proceeds amounted to 3.6 percent of global gross domestic product in 2009, according to a recent UN report -- a sum totaling more than $2 trillion. More than 2.5 percent of global GDP was likely laundered through the financial system, the report finds.
Crime proceeds are higher in developing countries as measured by a proportion of gross domestic product, the report found. And despite efforts worldwide to counter money laundering, authorities are coming up short; less than 1 percent of money laundered through the financial system is ever seized and frozen.
The report's findings indicate that "dirty money" can have economic consequences for the countries it flows through, Yury Fedotov the executive director of the UN's Office of Drug and Crime said in the report.
"In some cases, the influx of tainted money undermines the reputations of local institutions," Fedotov said. "Significantly, these investments can hamper investment and economic growth."
World leaders including David Luna, the U.S.'s director for Anticrime Programs met earlier this week in Phuket, Thailand earlier this week to find ways for various agencies to cooperate in fighting corruption and illicit trade.
"Increasingly sophisticated and organized webs of crime and corruption fuel greater insecurity, instability, and subversion across our economies, threaten our communities, and imperil the health and safety of our people," Luna said at the conference.
One example of this interagency cooperation is a bi-national study from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency in cooperation with Mexico, which investigated the way cash from drug cartels is transported and delivered. The study estimates that anywhere between $19 and $29 billion travels from the U.S. to Mexico to fund drug cartels.
Other countries are also becoming increasingly aggressive in fighting money laundering and corruption. Officials in Singapore announced Thursday that they will mull tighter penalties and up enforcement against money launderers, according to Bloomberg. The U.S. State Department criticized Singapore in a report in March saying the country was vulnerable to money laundering.
0 comments:
Post a Comment